*
skip to Main Content
enquiries@thearmchairtrader.com

Sign up for our Free Daily Digest newsletter: Actionable insight every morning, designed for the self-directed investor. Find out more

If you like event risk, then this week has it in spades – in fact, this would take a prize as having some of the most impactful event risks in one week I’ve seen, so it could get a bit wild out there.

Risk management becomes a science, more so than ever, and it’s in these situations, should you choose to stay in, where we consider volatility and adjust our risk accordingly as whippy moves just increase the risk of getting stopped out and paying spread – This obviously means reducing position sizing should you take on more risk.

Here is the weekly implied volatility matrix (prices from the Friday close) for a guide on expected movement with a 68.2% and 90% degree of confidence in gold and key FX pairs.

Implied volatility matrix

Consider on the calendar this week we get:

  • US election – clearly the dominant force – will we get an outcome on the day, or by Friday (if it comes down to Pennsylvania)? Will any key states contest the outcome?
  • Covid newsflow – UK and EU lockdowns increase fears of a renewed economic downturn. Huge Covid cases are also being seen in the US, with a rapid rise in hospitalizations. A vaccine can’t come fast enough.
  • FOMC meeting (Friday 6am AEST) – could the Fed give a clear signal of new policy action in the December meeting? Will it turn out to be the non-event most traders expect?
  • RBA meeting – Tuesday 14:30 AEST – the RBA is firmly expected to lower the cash rate to 10bp, as well as its 3-year bond yield target – the bank should announce a new QE (bond-buying) package of $100b, to be implemented by end-2021.
  • BoE meeting – the market has pared back its view on negative rates, but it would not surprise if the bank increased its bond-buying (QE) program by £100b to £ New forecasts on growth and inflation could get some focus, although economics are incredibly hard to model given the new restrictions and the prospect that these drag on over the Christmas period.
  • US non-farm payrolls – seemingly a non-event given the US election, but it should be on the radar. The consensus expects 600,000 jobs to be created, with the unemployment rate to tick down 20bp to 7.7% (the participation rate is eyed at 61.5%).

The US election takes the crown though, and the overriding question is whether we get an outcome on the night or whether it drags on for a day or two – or, if a race is close could certain states be contested, a fate that would negatively impact risk assets. A contested outcome is more of an issue where that state may very well decide the final out of the presidency, such as Florida.

Election expectations matrix

Here we see the current aggregated expectations model for the Presidency, House, and Senate. Clearly, expectations for Biden’s presidency are incredibly high, and the likes of FiveThirtyEight see a much higher probability of Biden winning than they did Hillary Clinton at this point in the race in 2016.

Many will disagree with these numbers, pointing to rapid changes in demographics, voter registration (in favour of the Republican party) and the silent Trump vote. The Senate race looks too close to call.

The Senate race

Certain states are almost guaranteed to vote Democrat or Republican, so it’s the swing states, such as Florida, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Arizona, Michigan, Wisconsin, Iowa and Ohio, that will decide the fate of who gets the required 270 Electoral College seats to become the President. Many believe that if Biden can take Florida, he is basically home, although the odds of this are less than 50%, with Biden’s prospects also elevated if he could take North Carolina and Pennsylvania

If Trump can take Florida and Pennsylvania it becomes very interesting.

Most political watchers therefore say the three key states to watch are Florida, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina, although we may not get the outcome in Pennsylvania until later in the week. Expect markets to move when we hear the outcome of these states, or specifically, when a TV network calls their projected outcome, which they only do when their models reach a 99.5% confidence level.

Given the incredible level of mail-in voting, certain states, such as Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, will likely take longer to release results.

Consider there is no set time, so keep your eyes peeled on Twitter feed and TV networks for breaking news. It may be first movers’ advantage.


The race for the Senate

The Senate is perhaps just as important in many ways, as whoever is in control here will dictate the size and scope of any future fiscal stimulus and the ability to pass many of the more significant Presidential agendas. The REP should gain Alabama, which would take them to 54 seats (of 100), but the DEMs are expected to take Arizona, Colorado, Maine, and North Carolina, which should create 50 seats a piece for each party. In this situation, the final say goes to the Vice-President.

Expected market reaction

Another thing is the potential reaction in markets. It would not surprise if we just had a pure risk rally simply on an actual outcome, and a scenario where traders have to close contested election hedges. This would be a short affair before the market re-focused on who is the president and the make-up of Congress.

Expected market reaction

I’ve put together what the various outcomes are expected to mean for markets, or at least the consensus expectations. At this point, we need to consider market expectations, positioning and changes in liquidity conditions, and not just the direction markets are expected to move when they start forging a higher conviction on the final outcome – as each state is projected by various networks the market will have a clearer idea on the outcome, although certain states (as talked before) will carry far more weight.

Certainly, liquidity can have huge implications for trading costs, and as we saw in 2016 bid/offer spreads blew out dramatically.

React and survive

The other consideration is to not be married to a view. This playbook is what is expected given a simple sense check of policies and the stance on fiscal support, which is key. While a DEM clean sweep might be considered a strong USD negative, a case could be made that it could be a USD positive. As always holding an open mind, not just to the results but market moves – the ability to react is key.

This article is brought to you in association with Pepperstone. All opinions expressed in this article are from the author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of The Armchair Trader.

Related

Please note this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors are encouraged to do their own research beforehand or consult a professional advisor.

Chris Weston

Chris Weston

Chris Weston is Pepperstone’s Head of Research and holds over 20 years of experience trading and analysing markets. A highly-respected markets expert, Chris has worked at IG, Merrill Lynch, Credit Suisse and Morgan Stanley, covering research as well as sales and trading roles. His extensive exposure to the FX, equities and fixed income markets puts him in a unique position to provide inspiring insights, research, ideas and risk-management strategies that support every step of your trading journey. Based in Australia, Chris is a well-known global media figure, regularly appearing on Bloomberg, CNBC, Channel News Asia and Sky News

Comments

Back To Top