Galantas Gold Corporation [LON:GAL] has taken a decisive step away from junior obscurity. On January 6, the Toronto- and London-listed miner agreed to acquire full ownership of the Andacollo Oro Gold Project in central Chile, a past-producing asset that materially alters the scale and complexion of the company.
If approved, the transaction will qualify as a “fundamental acquisition” under TSX Venture Exchange rules, an apt description for a deal that shifts Galantas from a single-asset explorer to an aspiring multi-asset producer.
The Andacollo Oro project lies in Chile’s Coquimbo region, around 55km from the coastal city of La Serena, at a modest elevation by Andean standards. It is no greenfield punt. The mine operated for two decades as a large-scale open-pit heap leach, producing 1.12m ounces of gold between 1998 and 2018 and peaking at annual output of roughly 135,000 ounces.
Infrastructure remains in place, including leach pads, mine earthworks and an adsorption–desorption–recovery plant with nameplate capacity of 200,000 ounces a year.
- AIM Market Roundup: Catenai, Sabien, Cerillion
- Mobile Streams: AIM admission marks pivot to LatAm sports and media
- AIM Market Roundup: Galantas Gold, Alba Minerals, Savannah Energy
A rare opportunity for a junior miner
For a junior company, such brownfield optionality is rare. Historical resource estimates point to measured and indicated resources of just over 2m ounces of gold, with inferred resources exceeding 5m ounces. The database underpinning those figures is extensive: some 1,600 drill holes totalling 190,000 metres. While these estimates will need to be updated to current reporting standards, they offer a degree of geological comfort that early-stage projects lack.
The price reflects both the asset’s scale and Galantas’ need for financial discipline. Total consideration of $32m will be paid in stages over four years, with just $4.5m due at closing, much of it via the assumption of existing debt.
The largest tranche, $14m, falls due only at the end of 2029. In addition, the vendor’s principal shareholder will receive shares equivalent to just under 20 per cent of Galantas’ equity, aligning interests while limiting immediate cash strain.
There are, however, complexities. The acquisition is structured through a chain of holding companies, one of which is owned by a Galantas executive, making the deal a related-party transaction under Canadian and UK rules.
The board argues that the terms were negotiated on a commercial basis and has leaned on regulatory exemptions rather than a formal valuation. Minority shareholder approval will still be required, a reminder that governance, not geology, can be the decisive variable in small-cap mining.
The geological case is clear for Galantas
Strategically, the logic is clear. Chile remains one of the world’s most established mining jurisdictions, and Andacollo sits beside Teck Resources’ producing Carmen de Andacollo copper mine. While adjacency does not guarantee shared mineralisation, historical drilling has hinted at copper potential beneath the gold system, adding speculative upside. Silver streams held by third parties will dilute by-product revenues, but gold is the prize.
The deal also complements Galantas’ existing Indiana gold-copper project, where a preliminary economic assessment is under way and drilling is planned for early 2026. Together, the assets give management optionality: a choice between restarting a known producer and advancing an earlier-stage development, depending on markets, permitting and capital availability.
For investors, the transaction is a wager on timing as much as on ore. Gold prices remain elevated, financing windows are reopening and brownfield projects with permits and infrastructure are once again fashionable.
If Galantas can navigate the regulatory hurdles and fund the staged payments without excessive dilution, Andacollo could offer a faster route to cash flow than most junior miners enjoy. Failure, as ever in the sector, would be costly. But for a company seeking relevance, standing still was the greater risk.
Comments (0)